ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF WORLD SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article presents the results of research on the essence of ecological aspects of world socio-economic development. The purpose of the article is to generalize theoretical approaches to the study of the essence of ecological aspects of world socio-economic development and directions of its ecologization process. In the course of the study, general scientific methods were used, such as: the dialectic of the general and the individual; historical and logical method; the method of scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis; method of analysis of regional and world dimension; method of system generalization, etc. In the framework of studying the role of ecology and its impact on the socio-economic development of society, a conceptual model is proposed that defines the positions of this area of knowledge, taking into account the objective tendencies of contemporary scientific thought. In the course of the study, it was proved that the formation of the basis of environmental policy, which would allow simultaneous preservation of the natural habitat and appropriate environmental conditions, create favorable conditions for achieving high indicators of economic growth and increase the level of welfare and social satisfaction of the population is a difficult but necessary task for all levels of social and economic development.
References
Белл Д. Грядущее постиндустриальное общество. Опыт социального прогнозирования. 2-е издание, исп. и доп. М. : Академия, 2004. 788 с.
Бьолер Д. Ідея та обов’язковість відповідальності за майбутнє // Філософська думка. 2007. № 1. С. 117–134. № 2. С. 77–95. № 3. С. 81–99.
Вернадский В. И. Научная мысль как планетное явление. М. : Наука, 1988. 520 с.
Данилов-Данильян В. И., Лосев К. С. Экологический вызов и устойчивое развитие. М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. 416 с.
Дейлі Г. Поза зростанням. Економічна теорія сталого розвитку. К. : Інтелсфера, 2002. 234 с.
Довгаль О. А., Довгаль Г. В. Міжнародний технологічний поділ праці як синергетичний ефект глобалізації // Академічний огляд. 2008. № 2. С. 94-98.
Довгаль О. А Протекціонізм і лібералізм у зовнішньоторговельних відносинах у процесі глобалізації економіки : автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня д-ра економ. наук : спец. 08.00.01 «Економічна теорія». Харків : ХНУ імені В. Н. Каразіна, 2006. 35 с.
Baumol, W., Oates, W. 1975. The Theory o f environmental policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 210р.
Buttel, F., Taylor, P. 1994. Environmental sociology and global environmental change. W: Social theory and the global environment, ed. by M. Redclift, T. Benton. London and New York: Routledge. р. 18-23.
Pearce, D.W., Turner, K.R . 1990. Economics o f natural resource and the environment. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 260 р.
Redclift, M., Woodgate, G. 1994. Sociology and the environment. W : Social theory and the global environment, ed. by M. Redclift, T. Benton. London and New York: Routledge. 125 р.
Sklair, L. 2015. Global sociology and environmental change. W: Social theory and the global environment, ed. by M. Redclift, T. Benton. London and New York: Routledge. 213 р.
Bell, D. (2004). Gryadushchee postindustrialnoe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya [The coming post-industrial society. Social Forecasting Experience]. M. : Akademiya [in Russian].
Boler, D. (2007). Ideia ta oboviazkovist vidpovidalnosti za maibutnie [The idea and commitment of responsibility for the future]. // Filosofska dumka - Philosophical thought, 1, 117–134, 2, 77–95, 3. 81–99. [in Ukrainian].
Vernadskiy, V.I. (1988). Nauchnaya mysl kak planetnoe yavlenie [Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon]. M. : Nauka [in Russian].
Danilov-Danilyan, V. I., Losev, K. S. (2000). Ekologicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoe razvitie [Environmental Challenge and Sustainable Development]. M. : Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
Deili, H. (2002). Poza zrostanniam. Ekonomichna teoriia staloho rozvytku [Out of growth. Economic Theory of Sustainable Development]. K. : Intelsfera, 2002. [in Ukrainian].
Dovhal, O. A., Dovhal, H. V. (2008). Mizhnarodnyi tekhnolohichnyi podil pratsi yak synerhetychnyi efekt hlobalizatsii [International technological division of labor as a synergistic effect of globalization] // Akademichnyi ohliad - Academic review, 2, 94-98. [in Ukrainian].
Dovhal, O. A. (2006). Protektsionizm i liberalizm u zovnishnotorhovelnykh vidnosynakh u protsesi hlobalizatsii ekonomiky [Protectionism and liberalism in foreign trade relations in the process of globalization of the economy]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv : KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. [in Ukrainian].
Baumol, W., Oates, W. (1975). The Theory o f environmental policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall (in English).
Buttel, F., Taylor, P. (1994). Environmental sociology and global environmental change. Social theory and the global environment. M. Redclift, T. Benton (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge. р. 18-23. (in English).
Pearce, D.W., Turner, K.R. (1990). Economics o f natural resource and the environment. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf (in English).
Redclift, M., Woodgate, G. (1994). Sociology and the environment. Social theory and the global environment. M. Redclift, T. Benton (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge (in English).
Sklair, L. (2015). Global sociology and environmental change. W: Social theory and the global environment, ed. by M. Redclift, T. Benton. London and New York: Routledge (in English).
