EVOLUTION OF THEORIES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISES IN THE MODERN DIMENSION OF MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Abstract
The speed of economic change in the global environment is so great, and the inertia of modern thinking is so strong that the current economics in some cases simply does not keep up with the changes taking place in the object of its analysis. As a result, there is a conflict between outdated theories and the new reality, there are scientific claims about the systemic crisis of economic theory. The main purpose of the article is to generalize the genesis of theories, models of economic development of the national economy and the formation of a set of tools and mechanisms for the development of economic entities in the modern dimension of management concepts. The methodological basis of scientific research is general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge (methods of scientific deduction and induction, comparison and systematization, synthesis). The author's team systematizes the evolutionary stages of formation of scientific theories, concepts and models of economic development of enterprises on the basis of research of both scientific schools and the provisions of individual representatives of this scientific hypothesis. The digression of basic theories of economic development testifies to the transition of scientific views from a set of models of economic development of closed space, to structural transformations of global scale, taking into account institutional and structural gaps that are inherent in certain countries at different stages of their development. In particular, Ukrainian and foreign practice of implementing national economic models has allowed generalizing the conceptual approaches to models of economic development adapted and based on programs and strategies of socio-economic development of economic entities in the modern dimension of management concepts. Economic development of the national economy as a dynamic complex socio-economic system, self-developing and characterized by cyclical stages of growth and decline of the economy is irreversible, aimed at qualitative and quantitative changes in national development is justified. In modeling the economic development of enterprises of the national economy should take into account the objective patterns of dynamic processes of the socio-economic system, modern management concepts and be based on a balanced assessment of driving forces, sources, resources, factors is defined in the article.
References
Schumpeter J.A. (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process in 2 vols. New York : McGra. Hill. 461 p.
Кондратьев Н.Д. Основные проблемы економической динамики. Москва : Наука, 1991. 550 с.
Штулер І.Ю. Еволюція теорій економічного розвитку у сучасному вимірі знань. Глобальні та національні проблеми економіки. 2016. Вип. 9. С. 216–219.
Ярченко Ю.В. Теорія економічних циклів і сучасна глобальна криза. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2012. Вип. 82. С. 384–388.
Chenery H. B. (1975) The structuralist approach to development policy. American association Papers and Proceedings. № 65. P. 310–316.
Harrod R. (1939) An Essay in Dynamic Theory I I Economic Journal. № 49. P. 14–33.
Domar E. (1946) Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment. Econometrica. N. 14. P. 137–147.
Joan Robinson (1962) Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Р. 138.
Желюк Т. Структурні трансформації як джерело формування нової якості економічного зростання. Світ фінансів. Наук. журнал. ТНЕУ, 2010. Вип. 2. С. 7–17.
Колодко Гж. Від ідеології неолібералізму до нового прагматизму. Економіка України. 2010. № 9. С. 10–11.
Москаленко О. М. Випереджаючий економічний розвиток: теоретико-інституціональні засади і проблеми реалізації в Україні. Економіка України. 2014. № 8 (633). С. 4–18.
Нова парадигма філософії економіки ХХІ століття. Гуманітарний вісник Запорізької державної інженерної академії. 2011. Вип. 46. С. 19–32.
Хлобистов Є.В. Економічна безпека трансформаційної економіки [Відп. ред. С.І. Дорогунцов]. Київ; Чорнобильінтерінформ, 2004. 260 с.
William Burr. (1998) The Kissinger Transcripts. New York, Р. 340.
Трансформація моделі економіки України (ідеологія, протиріччя, перспективи) / за ред. акад. HAH України В.М. Гейця. Київ : Логос, 1999. 500 с.
Кваснюк Б.Є. Відтворювальна структура національної економіки. Економічна теорія. 2007. № 4. С. 71–82.
Schumpeter J.A. (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process in 2 vols. New York : McGra. Hill. 461 p.
Kondratev N.D. (1991) Osnovnyie problemyi ekonomicheskoy dinamiki [The main problems of economic dynamics] Moskva: Nauka, 550 p.
Shtuler I.Yu. (2016) Evolyutsiya teorIy ekonomichnogo rozvitku u suchasnomu vimiri znan [Evolution of theories of economic development in the modern dimension of knowledge]. Globalni ta natsionalni problemi ekonomiki. Vip. 9, p. 216–219.
Yarchenko Yu.V. (2012) TeorIya ekonomichnih tsikliv i suchasna globalna kriza [The theory of economic cycles and the current global crisis]. TavrIyskiy naukoviy vIsnik. Vip. 82. p. 384-388.
Chenery H.B. (1975) The structuralist approach to development policy. American association Papers and Proceedings. № 65. P. 310–316.
Harrod R. (1939) An Essay in Dynamic Theory I I Economic Journal. № 49. P. 14–33.
Domar E. (1946) Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment. Econometrica. N. 14. P. 137–147.
Joan Robinson (1962) Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Р. 138.
Zhelyuk T. (2010) Strukturni transformatsiyi yak dzherelo formuvannya novoyi yakosti ekonomichnogo zrostannya [Structural transformations as a source of formation of a new quality of economic growth]. SvIt fInansIv. Nauk. zhurnal. TNEU, Vip. 2. p. 7–17.
Kolodko Gzh. (2010) Vid ideologiyineoliberalizmu do novogo pragmatizmu [From the ideology of neoliberalism to the new pragmatism]. EkonomIka UkraYini. № 9. p. 10–11.
Moskalenko O.M. (2014) Viperedzhayuchiy ekonomichniy rozvitok: teoretiko-institutsionalni zasadi i problemi realizatsiyi v Ukrayini [Advancing economic development: theoretical and institutional principles and problems of implementation in Ukraine]. EkonomIka UkraYini.# 8 (633). p. 4–18.
Nova paradigma filosofiyi ekonomiki ХХІ stolIttya. [A new paradigm of philosophy of economics of the XXI century].(2011) GumanItarniy vIsnik ZaporIzkoYi derzhavnoYi InzhenernoYi akademIYi. Vip. 46. p. 19–32.
Hlobistov E.V. (2004) Ekonomichna bezpeka transformatsiynoyi ekonomiki [Economic security of transformational economy] [VIdp. red. S.I. Doroguntsov]. Kyiv; ChornobilInterInform, 260 p.
William Burr. (1998) The Kissinger Transcripts. New York, Р. 340.
Transformatsiya modeli ekonomiki Ukrayini (IdeologIya, protirIchchya, perspektivi) [Transformation of the economic model of Ukraine (ideology, contradictions, prospects)] (1999) / za red. akad. HAH UkraYini V.M. Geytsya. Kyiv: Logos, 500 p.
Kvasnyuk B.E. (2007) VIdtvoryuvalna struktura natsionalnoyi ekonomiki [Reproductive structure of the national economy]. Ekonomichna teoriya, №4. S. 71–82.
