FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF GOVERNMENT BANKRUPTCY REGULATION IN THE POST-INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY
Abstract
The bankruptcy institution transformation in European and some others countries over the past 15-20 years have taken place under the influence of a paradigm shift of the enterprise as a basic economic institution in the post-industrial economy. Such a change in characteristics of enterprise also changes the understanding of the debtor in bankruptcy proceedings. The article is devoted to study the transformation of foreign models of government bankruptcy regulation in foreign countries in recent years, the possibility of using foreign experience in determining the model of government regulation in Ukraine. A comparative assessment of certain elements of legislation in the field of bankruptcy regulation in the UK, Germany, France, USA and Russia allowed to establish the features of modern legal regulation of relations in this area. A detailed classification of the types of models of government bankruptcy regulation is given and criteria for assigning national laws to one or another model are determined. The assessment of national legislation of foreign countries in the field of bankruptcy according to each of the criteria allowed to more accurately establish the legislation of these countries to one of the five models of government bankruptcy regulation: extremely pro-creditor's, moderate pro-creditor's, neutral, moderate pro-debtor's or extremely pro-debtor's. In particular, the model of government bankruptcy regulation in the United States is characterized as radically pro-receivable, as well as pro-receivables is the legislation in the field of bankruptcy in France. In other countries, there is a pro-creditor orientation of the legislative model of government bankruptcy regulation: from radical pro-creditor in the UK to moderately creditor in Germany and Russia. The need to revise the domestic legislation in the field of bankruptcy regulation in the direction of creating mechanisms to continue the operation of the debtor company regardless of the change of owner and/or organizational and legal entity form of the debtor as a result of bankruptcy proceedings.
References
Baumgartner F., Dupuis A. The Insolvency Review – France. The Law Reviews. United Kingdom, December 2019. Edition 7. URL : https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211460/france (accessed: 14 July 2020).
Bernstein Donald S., Graulich T., Robertson C. S., Green T. The Insolvency Review – United States. The Law Reviews. United Kingdom, December 2019. Edition 7. URL : https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211461/united-states (accessed: 14 July 2020).
Doing business : Business Regulation Evaluation. Retrospective Datasets and Trend Data. Washington, USA : WORD BANK GROUP, 2020. URL : https://russian.doingbusiness.org/ru/custom-query (accessed: 14 July 2020).
Domenget-Morin C., Pousset B., Gicquel M., Cobigo E. Insolvency 2019. France. PRACTICE GUIDES. Chambers and Partners, London, United Kingdom. November 20, 2019. Second Edition. URL : https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/insolvency-2019-second-edition/france (accessed: 14 July 2020).
Newman P., McMaster K., Drylie I. The Insolvency Review - England & Wales. The Law Reviews. United Kingdom, December 2019. Edition 7. URL : https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211455/england-wales (accessed: 14 July 2020).
Безбородова Т.И. Сравнительный анализ моделей идентификации несостоятельности предприятий. Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2003. № 3. URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-modeley-identifikatsii-nesostoyatelnosti-predpriyatiy (дата обращения: 20.07.2020).
Бештоев М.И. Тенденции развития института банкротства: движение от репрессии к реабилитации должника. СРРМ. 2015. № 5(92). URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tendentsii-razvitiya-instituta-bankrotstva-dvizhenie-ot-repressii-k-reabilitatsii-dolzhnika (дата обращения: 20.07.2020).
Вольвач Б.В. Моделі правового регулювання відносин неплатоспроможності та банкрутства. Право і суспільство. 2019. № 3. С. 159–166. URL : http://pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2019/3_2019/part_1/29.pdf (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
Галкин С.С. Правовой анализ моделей банкротства должника – юридического лица с учетом современных условий постиндустриального общественного развития. Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2016. № 8(69). URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoy-analiz-modeley-bankrotstva-dolzhnika-yuridicheskogo-litsa-s-uchetom-sovremennyh-usloviy-postindustrialnogo-obschestvennogo (дата обращения: 05.09.2020).
Королев В.В., Чупрова А.Ю. Особенности законодательства о банкротстве США и Великобритании: сравнительно-правовой аспект. Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. 2007. № 1. URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-zakonodatelstva-o-bankrotstve-ssha-i-velikobritanii-sravnitelno-pravovoy-aspekt (дата обращения: 09.07.2020)
Кушнір І. Особливості державного регулювання банкрутства: зарубіжний досвід та національний аспект. Репозиторий Національної бібліотеки України імені В.І. Вернадського. URL : http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/46348/25-Kushnir.pdf?sequence=1 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
Поцелуев Е.Л., Чистяков П.Д. Основания несостоятельности по законодательству Федеративной Республики Германия. Наука. Общество. Государство. 2018. Т. 6. № 2(22). URL : https://esj.pnzgu.ru/files/esj.pnzgu.ru/potseluev_el_chistyakov_pd_2018_2_11.pdf (дата обращения: 22.08.2020).
Скрипичников Д.В. Некоторые вопросы законодательства о несостоятельности (банкротстве) Великобритании. ПСЭ. 2010. № 2. URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nekotorye-voprosy-zakonodatelstva-o-nesostoyatelnosti-bankrotstve-velikobritanii (дата обращения: 05.12.2018).
Телюкина М.В. Продолжниковые элементы в современном российском конкурсном праве – наличие и целесообразность. Юрист. 2013. № 24. С. 3–5.
Трубина Ю.Е. Технология оценки национального законодательства о несостоятельности (банкротстве). Новости науки и технологий. 2016. № 2(37). С. 29–35. URL : http://belisa.org.by/pdf/Publ/Art5_i37.pdf (дата обращения: 02.09.2020).
Федеральный закон от 26.10.2002 № 127-ФЗ «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» (с изменениями на 31 июля 2020 г.) (редакция, действующая с 1 сентября 2020 г.). Электронный фонд правовой и нормативно-технической документации. URL : http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901831019 (дата обращения: 22.09.2020).
Чернова М.В. Сравнительный анализ зарубежных процедур корпоративного банкротства. Финансы и кредит. 2008. № 46(334). URL : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-zarubezhnyh-protsedur-korporativnogo-bankrotstva (дата обращения: 29.07.2020).
Чорна Ю.В. Світові системи банкрутства: господарсько-правовий аспект : автореф. дис. … канд. юр. наук : 12.00.04 «Господарське право, господарсько-процесуальне право». Київ, 2018. 19 с.
Шишмарева Т.П. Институт несостоятельности в России и Германии : монография. Москва, 2015. 332 с.
Baumgartner F., Dupuis A. (2019) The Insolvency Review - France. The Law Reviews (electronic journal), (7th ed.). Available at: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211460/france (accessed 14 July 2020).
Bernstein Donald S., Graulich T., Robertson C. S., Green T. (2019) The Insolvency Review - United States. The Law Reviews (electronic journal), (7th ed.). Available at: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211461/united-states (accessed 14 July 2020).
DOING BUSINESS: Business Regulation Evaluation. Retrospective Datasets and Trend Data (2020) [Site of journal WORD BANK GROUP]. Available at: https://russian.doingbusiness.org/ru/custom-query (accessed 14 July 2020).
Domenget-Morin C., Pousset B., Gicquel M., Cobigo E. (2019) Insolvency 2019. France. PRACTICE GUIDES. (2nd ed). Available at: https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/insolvency-2019-second-edition/france (accessed 14 July 2020).
Newman P., McMaster K., Drylie I. (2019) The Insolvency Review - England & Wales. The Law Reviews (electronic journal), (7th ed.). Available at: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-insolvency-review-edition-7/1211455/england-wales (accessed 14 July 2020).
Bezborodova T.I. (2003) Sravnitel'nyy analiz modeley identifikatsii nesostoyatel'nosti predpriyatiy [Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Insolvency Identification Models]. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic analysis: theory and practice] (electronic journal), no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-modeley-identifikatsii-nesostoyatelnosti-predpriyatiy (accessed 20 July 2020).
Beshtoyev M.I. (2015) Tendentsii razvitiya instituta bankrotstva: dvizheniye ot repressii - k reabilitatsii dolzhnika [Development trends of bankruptcy institution: movement from repression to rehabilitation of the debtor]. СРРМ [CPPM] (electronic journal), no. 5 (92), pp. 62−74. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tendentsii-razvitiya-instituta-bankrotstva-dvizhenie-ot-repressii-k-reabilitatsii-dolzhnika (accessed 20 July 2020).
Volvach B. V. (2019) Modeli pravovoho rehuliuvannia vidnosyn neplatospromozhnosti ta bankrutstva [Legal regulation of insolvency and bankruptcy models. Pravo i suspilstvo [Law and society] (electronic journal), no. 3, pp. 159−166. Availableat: http://pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2019/3_2019/part_1/29.pdf (accessed 22 August 2020)
Galkin S. S. (2016) Pravovoy analiz modeley bankrotstva dolzhnika-yuridicheskogo litsa s uchetom sovremennykh usloviy postindustrial'nogo obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Legal analysis of models of bankruptcy of a legal entity with due regard to modern conditions of postindustrial society development]. Aktual'n·yye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual problems of Russian law] (electronic journal), no. 8 (69). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoy-analiz-modeley-bankrotstva-dolzhnika-yuridicheskogo-litsa-s-uchetom-sovremennyh-usloviy-postindustrialnogo-obschestvennogo (accessed 05 September 2020).
Korolev V. V., Chuprova A. Yu. (2007) Osobennosti zakonodatel'stva o bankrotstve SSHA i Velikobritanii: sravnitel'no-pravovoy aspekt [Features of the bankruptcy legislation of the United States and Great Britain: a comparative legal aspect]. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki [Problems of economics and legal practice] (electronic journal), no. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-zakonodatelstva-o-bankrotstve-ssha-i-velikobritanii-sravnitelno-pravovoy-aspekt (accessed 09 July 2020)
Kushnir I. (2008) Osoblyvosti derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia bankrutstva zarubizhnyi dosvid ta natsionalnyi aspekt [Features of state regulation of bankruptcy: foreign experience and national aspect]. Repozytoryi Natsionalnoi Biblioteky Ukrainy Imeni V. I. Vernadskoho [Repository of the National Library of Ukraine named after V.I. Vernadsky] (repository). Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/46348/25-Kushnir.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 22 August 2020).
Potseluyev Ye. L., Chistyakov P. D. (2018) Osnovaniya nesostoyatel'nosti po zakonodatel'stvu Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya [Reasons for insolvency under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Репозиторий Elektronnogo nauchnogo zhurnala «Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo» [Repository of the Electronic Scientific Journal «Science. Society. State»] (electronic journal), vol. 6, no. 2 (22). Available at: https://esj.pnzgu.ru/files/esj.pnzgu.ru/potseluev_el_chistyakov_pd_2018_2_11.pdf (accessed 22 August 2020).
Skripichnikov D. V. (2010) Nekotor·yye voprosy zakonodatel'stva o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) Velikobritanii [Some questions of UK insolvency (bankruptcy) law]. PSE [PSE] (electronic journal), no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nekotorye-voprosy-zakonodatelstva-o-nesostoyatelnosti-bankrotstve-velikobritanii (accessed 5 July 2020).
Telyukina M. V. (2013) Prodolzhnikov·yye elementy v sovremennom rossiyskom konkursnom prave - nalichiye i tselesoobraznost' [Pro-debtor's elements in modern Russian bankruptcy law - availability and feasibility]. Yurist [Lawyer], (electronic journal), no. 24, pp. 3-5.
Trubina Yu. Ye. Tekhnologiya otsenki natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) (2016) [Technology for assessment of the belarusian legislation on insolvency (bankruptcy)]. Novosti nauki i tekhnologiy [Science and technology news] (electronic journal), no. 2 (37), pp. 29−35. Available at: http://belisa.org.by/pdf/Publ/Art5_i37.pdf (accessed 2 July 2020).
Federalnyi zakon «O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)» [Federal Law «Insolvency (bankruptcy)»]. (n.d.). Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii. Retrieved from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901831019 [in Russian].
Chernova M.V. Sravnitel'nyy analiz zarubezhnykh protsedur korporativnogo bankrotstva (2008) [Comparative analysis of foreign corporate bankruptcy procedures]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and credit] (electronic journal), (electronic journal), no. 46 (334). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-zarubezhnyh-protsedur-korporativnogo-bankrotstva (accessed 29 July 2020).
Chorna Yu. V. (2018) Svіtovі sistemi bankrutstva: gospodars'ko-pravoviy aspekt [Global bankruptcy systems: economic and legal aspect]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shishmareva T.P. (2015) Institut nesostoyatel'nosti v Rossii i Germanii [Insolvency Institute in Russia and Germany]. Мoscow: Statut. (in Russian).
