CORPORATE CULTURE MODEL IN SYSTEM CORPORATE GOVERNANCE : UKRAINIAN REALITIES

Keywords: corporate culture, corporate management, model, system, company

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the substantive and qualitative characteristics of corporate governance in Ukraine, identify problems of its development and develop a scientific approach to form an organizational model of corporate culture as a factor of successful development. The author's research based on the essence of the concept of "corporate governance" in order to improve the content characteristics of this. With the active use of data collection and regression analysis methods, the level of corporate governance in Ukraine was determined. The qualitative indicators of corporate governance analyzed using the rating indicators of the Global Competitiveness Index. In such conditions, it becomes necessary to form an organizational model of corporate culture in the corporate governance system. The article substantiates the need to use the organizational model of corporate culture in the activities of Ukrainian companies, taking into account the problems of the development of corporate governance in Ukraine. This has a scientific and applied character in the context of political and economic turbulence in today's economic conditions. The organizational model of corporate culture proposed by the author will contribute to the activation and development of communication interaction between corporate management and all stack holders. This will also influence the formation of effective management decisions and create the basis for cooperation based on trust. The use of an organizational model of corporate governance in the performance of assigned tasks to personnel will increase their responsibility, cohesion, productivity and improve the socio-psychological climate in the company. The above features will help the corporate management of the company to harmoniously arrange and consolidate the list of work performed by each employee in the organizational structure of the company in such a way that everyone does their own thing in accordance with the existing professional competencies. Thus, the proposed organizational model of corporate culture will allow Ukrainian enterprises to effectively manage human resources and implement a development strategy in the long term.

References

Bukhvalov, A.V. (2005). Corporate governance as an object of scientific research. Russian Management Journal, 3 (3), 81–96.

Kramin, T.V., & Petrova, Ye. A. (2009). Development of the institution of corporate governance in Russia. Kazan: Publishing house "Poznanie" IEM.

Bebchuk, L., & Weisbach, M. (2010). The State of Corporate Governance Research. The Review of Financial Studies, 23 (3), 939–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121

Mc.Nulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, A. (2013). Developing Corporate Governance Research Using Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Research. Corporate governance: an international overview, 21 (2), 183–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12006

Vorobiyenko, P. (2015). On the way to the economy of future society. Economic Annals-XXI, 1–2 (1), 4–6. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84939221209&partnerID=40&md5=04540df6e00fde55ea772c3d8ab49736

Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, C. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate governance: an international overview, 11 (2), 102–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011

Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69 (7), 553–560.

Hereha, O.V. (2013). Economic stability of the enterprise and ways of its realization. Innovative economy, 43 (5), 57–59.

Gaspar, J. (2014). Economic growth and multiple equilibria: A critical note. Economic Modelling, 36, 157–160.

Schaltegger, S., Ludecke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016). Business models for sustainability: a co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Strategic Organization, 12 (1), 70–78.

Carter, D., Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G. (2010). Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards of Directors and Committees of US Boards of Directors and Company Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Overview, 18 (5), 396–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x

Pearson M., & Turnbull, S. (2011). Corporate Governance, Risk Management, and the Financial Crisis: An Information Processing View. Corporate governance: an international overview, 19 (5), 459–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00860.x

Stern, G.Yu. (2009). Corporate governance. Kharkiv: KNAMG.

Levtushevsky, V.A. (2002). Fundamentals of corporate governance. Kiev: Znannya-Press, 317.

Malskaya, M.P., Mandyuk, N.L., & Zanko Yu.S. (2012). Corporate governance: theory and practice. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.

Pavlov, V.I., & Misha, A. A. (2006). Corporate governance in joint stock companies. Lutsk: Nadstyr'ya, Rivne NUWHP.

Gryshova, I., Kriukova, I., & Mitiay, O. (2015). Ukraine’s positions in international ratings evaluation as a factor of its competitiveness. Economic Annals-XXI, 5–6, 24–27. Retrieved from: http://soskin.info/userfiles/file/2015/5-6%202015/Gryshova_Kriukova_Mitiai.pdf

Article views: 107
PDF Downloads: 76
Published
2021-10-26
How to Cite
Yevtushenko, N. (2021). CORPORATE CULTURE MODEL IN SYSTEM CORPORATE GOVERNANCE : UKRAINIAN REALITIES. Economic Scope, (174), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/174-13
Section
ECONOMY AND ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT